Home


Union County Residents Alliance Coalition

Our towns deserve the full picture.

A 250-megawatt AI data center is being built on the former Merck campus in Kenilworth. We gather what the public record shows, so neighbors can understand it and decide for themselves.

Resident-led and nonpartisan. Every figure here traces to a public record.

250 MW
Planned power capacity
$1.8B
Reported project cost
~40
On-site jobs, per testimony
$250M
State tax credit awarded
What’s happening

What’s being built on Galloping Hill Road

Where official records disagree with one another, we show the difference rather than hide it. These figures come from borough resolutions, the May 15, 2025 site-plan hearing, state filings, and news reporting.

Site
Former Merck HQ campus (NEST Building 11), 2000 Galloping Hill Road.
Owner
CoreWeave, Inc. (Nasdaq: CRWV). Bought the site for about $322 million in August 2025.
What it is
An AI computing data center, running 24 hours a day, every day.
Power
About 250 megawatts, comparable to the yearly electricity use of roughly 211,000 homes.
Building size
About 247,000 sq ft across three floors and a basement.
Equipment
31 backup generators, plus a cooling yard of 29 chillers and 4 water tanks.
Jobs
Roughly 40 on-site employees, per sworn testimony.
State incentive
A $250 million state tax credit, New Jersey’s first Next NJ AI award.
Where things stand
Under construction. No Redevelopment Agreement has been signed, and the developer designation has lapsed twice.
What an AI data center is

This is a large-scale facility for training and running artificial-intelligence systems, using specialized high-powered processors that draw enormous electricity and give off intense heat. The 250-megawatt figure reflects that scale. A typical office building runs on a tiny fraction of that power.

Why the equipment matters to neighbors

A facility like this needs continuous cooling and backup power. The site-plan described 31 standby generators and a yard of 29 chiller units with water tanks. That equipment is what drives the questions neighbors are asking about noise, air, water, and the grid.

Why neighbors are paying attention

The questions we’re asking together

A facility this size touches everyday life in measurable ways. These are the concerns residents have brought to public meetings and to a petition that has gathered thousands of signatures.

The electric grid

A 250-megawatt facility draws power on the order of a small city. What does that mean for grid reliability and utility costs across the region, and will the project pay its own way?

Water use

Large data centers use water to cool their equipment. The site-plan included a chiller yard with water tanks. How much water will it draw, and where will it come from?

Noise

Cooling units and generators run continuously. At the May 2025 hearing, decibel limits were discussed but not pinned down. Residents have asked for an independent study at the nearest homes.

Air and generators

The site-plan described 31 standby generators. How often will they run, including for testing, and what emissions limits apply next to a residential neighborhood?

The former lab site

The property is a former pharmaceutical campus. How are stormwater, flood risk, and any environmental obligations tied to the change of use being handled?

Home values

How might a large industrial-computing facility next to homes affect property values and quality of life over time? Residents want the effects tracked against the record.

What the public record shows

Facts from the borough’s own records

These are documented facts drawn from the borough’s own resolutions and hearings, presented without interpretation, so you can read them and ask your own questions.

01

No Redevelopment Agreement has been executed

The Redevelopment Plan makes a redeveloper’s designation conditional on signing a Redevelopment Agreement with the borough. As of June 2026, that agreement has not been signed for this parcel.

02

The redeveloper designation has lapsed twice

Resolutions 25-129 and 25-231 each set a deadline to sign that agreement, and each provided that the designation would automatically expire if the deadline passed. Both deadlines passed without an executed agreement, in September 2025 and again in April 2026.

03

The records describe more than one building

The borough’s designation resolutions describe “approximately 550,000 square foot data center(s),” in the plural, while the single building now being converted is about 247,000 square feet.

04

The parcel was split into four lots

On April 28, 2026, the 36-acre parcel was subdivided into four new lots. The application described developing the site for a data center and related uses.

Reading the numbers together

Several figures from the record do not line up with a single 40-megawatt building. The table below places the project as described next to the same figures multiplied across four similar lots. The right-hand column is simple arithmetic, not a statement of CoreWeave’s plans, and is offered only to show why residents have asked whether the full build-out is larger than one facility.

Measure
As described, one facility
Across four similar lots
On-site jobs
About 40, per testimony
About 120 to 160
Power
A first 40 megawatts
About 160 to 250 MW
For reference
Credit requires 143 jobs; reporting cites 250 MW
Beyond Kenilworth

Part of a statewide conversation

Kenilworth is not alone. As AI data centers spread across New Jersey, residents and state leaders are asking how these projects should be reviewed, powered, and held accountable.

The state has officially rescinded the tax program

The Next NJ AI credit that funded this project drew significant scrutiny in Trenton, with proposals to limit or repeal it and calls for data centers to pay for their own electricity. New Jersey lawmakers passed bills A5165 and S4390 “End Data Center Tax Credits Act on June 30th 2026.

Community benefit agreements are on the table

State leaders have proposed requiring large data centers to sign community benefit agreements and to take on more of their own infrastructure costs.

Other NJ towns face the same questions

Communities including Vineland, Andover, and New Brunswick have seen similar proposals and similar public debate over notice, scale, and local impact.

How you can help

You don’t need to be an expert to take part.

Here is where to start. Every signature, every meeting, and every contribution adds to the effort.

Sign the petition

Thousands of neighbors have added their names. It is one of the simplest ways to show the scale of community concern.

Sign now

Donate

UCRAC is resident-led. A contribution helps cover public outreach and keeping this record up to date.

Donate to UCRAC

Show up

Planning Board and Council meetings are open to all. Watch the borough agenda and come to listen or to speak.

View the agenda

Spread the word

Questions, documents, or want to help organize? Reach the coalition and we will follow up.

Email the coalition

Stay in the loop

Get plain-language updates as the project and the public process move forward, so you always know what is coming next.

or write to info@ucrac.org